SAN FRANCISCO SURVEY
THE ULS SAN FRANCISCO SURVEY
HAS THE SAN FRANCISCO BAN HARMED THE ENVIRONMENT BY INCREASING PAPER BAG USAGE?
HOME
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
PAPER BAGS AND CO2
SAN FRANCISCO SURVEY
PAPER BAGS IN LANDFILLS
PAPER BAGS AND ROACHES
THE TRUTH ABOUT LITTER
THE FAMOUS TURTLE PICTURE
"SERIES OF BLUNDERS" ARTICLE
IS THERE A "GARBAGE PATCH"?
THE VOYAGE OF THE "JUNK"
THE OIL MYTH
LA COUNTY SPREADING MYTHS
WHOLE FOODS GREENWASHING
BERKELEY BOWL'S SOLUTION
PLASTIC BAG RECYCLING BINS
LITIGATION
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
Welcome to NuWorld
THE ULS SAN FRANCISCO SURVEY

Many people believe that if plastic bags are banned, people will switch to reusable bags. They are wrong.

In 2007, the City of San Francisco passed an ordinance banning non-compostable plastic carryout bags in supermarkets and grocery stores with more than $2 million in annual sales and chain pharmacies The ordinance requires the use of paper bags, compostable plastic bags, or reusable bags.

To determine the impact of the ordinance, Robert Lilenfeld, President of The Cygnus Group and Editor of The ULS Report, traveled to San Francisco to observe store and customer bag usage and activity. A total of 25 retail stores were visited from September 14 to 17, 2008. Stores were walked through, store personnel were questioned, checkout activities were observed, and customers' bagging preferences were reviewed.

He found that all food chains affected by the ordinance had switched to paper bags only.

He also found that "very few people" brought reusable bags to the store -- no more than in other cities.


Lillenfeld concluded as follows:

If reducing environmental impact is the objective of the Ordinance, results to date do not indicate it will be successful. First, little use of reusable bags was observed. Second, the replacement of plastic by paper and the return to double bagging may actually increase environmental impact, as many peer reviewed lifecycle studies indicate that paper bags use more energy, produce more waste, and generate more greenhouse gas emissions than do plastic bags.

Click here for the full ULS survey report.

  Back to top
HAS THE SAN FRANCISCO BAN HARMED THE ENVIRONMENT BY INCREASING PAPER BAG USAGE?

 

The bags in the photo above were picked up as you see them at a Trader Joe's in San Francisco. Notice the double bagging. Paper handles are so weak that double bagging is necessary. Notice also that the bags are half-filled. Trader Joe's offers a paper bag like these even for a single item.

Paper bags are far worse for the environment than plastic bags. Paper bags result in between 2.0 and 3.3 times more greenhouse gas emissions than plastic bags. The negative environmental impacts of paper bags are far worse than the negative environmental impacts of plastic bags. As we have seen from the ULS report, banning plastic bags has resulted in an increase in the number of paper bags. Has the San Francisco ban improved the environment or harmed it?

  Back to top
Site By Spirit © 2008-11 Save The Plastic Bag Coalition. All rights reserved.